
|
 |
 |
If you've never had the CISM Basic
Training which highlights the Mitchell Model, this section will provide it. It
is not the model for onsite services, but you will see the overlap and the
attention to areas that need modification (Red).
International Critical Incident Stress
Foundation
In 1989, the
International Critical Incident Stress Foundation was formed. Its
two pioneers, Jeffrey T. Mitchell and George S. Everett Jr. came
together during Mitchell's Ph.D. dissertation on Paramedic Stress. He
came upon the work of Everly and the use of scales to assess individual
stress. Through early collaboration and consultation on cases, Mitchell,
with a focus on prevention, and Everly with a focus on treatment, seemed
like a perfect match to work together. They began disseminating
information, doing conferences and seeing the void in services for
high
risk occupations like firemen and emergency personnel.
With the emergence of the foundation, the two worked offering
interventions to emergency workers and training in this new found field.
Today the foundation has over 5000 members and provides an array of
services, training and consultation.
| "Historically, what we were
doing is crisis intervention. We were doing training, consultation
and intervention under the overall heading of crisis intervention.
So it's not like we invented a new field. We applied crisis
intervention principles to a group of professionals who had been,
to some degree, neglected as recipients of these types of
services. Along the way, we knew we had to make some adjustments
to the way crisis intervention would be practiced when compared to
a civilian population. Techniques such as critical incident stress
debriefing and the whole genre which we now call Critical Incident
Stress Management (CISM) emerged. In effect, what the foundation
really is, is a crisis intervention foundation. However, we apply
crisis intervention in a way that, historically, it has never been
applied before. This is in a very comprehensive way. We have a
comprehensive, total, multi-component approach to crisis
intervention and it has proven successful to the point that the
models are now being used with populations other than emergency
service personnel. It's being used by the airline industry, by
industries, school systems, psychiatric hospitals, and general
medical hospitals."
George S. Everly JR., Trauma
Response |
The primary focus in the field of CISM is to support
staff members of organizations or members of communities which have
experienced a traumatic event. What CISM does not share with the field of
crisis intervention is the range of the populations served. For example, CISM does not focus on primary victims such as auto accident victims, dog
bite victims, women suffering post-partum depression, women who have lost
a child in a
miscarriage, child abuse victims, substance abusers, victims of elder
abuse or sexual assault victims all of whom are typically served through
various other crisis intervention programs. Should primary victims with
those concerns come into contact with CISM trained personnel, the best
course of action is a referral to appropriate crisis intervention or
psychotherapy resources which are beyond the central focus and
capabilities of most CISM teams.
Jeffrey Mitchell Ph.D.,
Crisis Intervention and Critical Incident Stress
Management: A defense of the field; 2004 |
|
 |

Primary to the success of this intervention is the application of it on
the appropriate population. The ICISF/Mitchell Model intervention is designed for first
responders- police, fire, rescue, military, etc. Nonetheless it has been
tried on the general population in didn't settings by a variety of
professionals with different training experiences. Anecdotally the
response has been positive, but since greater exposure of the model to
scientific communities after Oklahoma City and 9/11, it has been
challenged.
|